4 ms·
I think that's wrong, though. Through 2010 or so (very roughly) there was still a ton of unmined valued in straightforward applications of technology. I mean,
by newacct583 6y ago
I think that's wrong, though. Through 2010 or so (very roughly) there was still a ton of unmined valued in straightforward applications of technology. I mean, sure, stuff goes wrong and there are bad aspects of culture, but looking at the industry through the Web 2.0 period it was really easy to convince yourself that this was all a Net Good Thing and making the world a better place (and that's true of Airbnb too!).
It's just not as true now. That fruit has been picked. There are still product ideas but they're about exploiting edges of an industry that has real problems, and not about fixing them.
I mean, whether the desire is there or not, the YC model isn't going to fix the climate crisis, or the disaster that the media ecosystem has become, or the increasingly dire level of income inequality in our society. And getting to my original point: pg's recent writings seem like he's made peace with that and is happy just chipping out new corners of the tech ecosystem and not Solving Problems People Have.
- cambalache 6y agoIn 2010 it was old old old news that: The world was drowning in electronic devices garbage, many containing toxic materials. American companies were taking advantage of highly exploitative conditions in the third world, especially China. Microsoft made millions "extorting" high licence fees for its software in many cases from poor 3rd world countries who had few option for what it was a de-facto monopoly. Patent trolls were rampant,SCO was trying to kill Linux, all with MS funding. RIIA was abusing the legal system, suing for millions a grandma who downloaded a couple of songs. You may think whatever you want, but being ignorant of basic facts make your opinion a little bit better than total irrelevance.