4 ms·
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-20-5A1.pdf https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-20-5A1.pdf III A 7, "we expect bidders seeking support for t
by zw123456 6y ago
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-20-5A1.pdf https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-20-5A1.pdf
III A 7,
"we expect bidders seeking support for the 25/3 Mbps tier will win support only in areas where higher speeds
are not economical, and that a five-year term .."
support for rural telcos IMO
- octoberfranklin 6y ago> the 25/3 Mbps tier That's not the gigabit tier. Read it again, paragraph 39 (it's a nice table). Then look at the map. Hardly any money went to the "minimum tier" you're referring to (25/3).
- zw123456 6y agothey have the option of dropping to the low tier if the costs are too high
- octoberfranklin 6y agoUm no, they don't. That is called defaulting. There is an entire section about how the FCC claws back all the money and then some more for penalties.