4 ms·
Then it’s not a system that works and shouldn’t be in place. You can’t just say, that’ll do, it’s too hard or expensive to do this properly, so let’s not. Amaz
by crispyporkbites 6y ago
Then it’s not a system that works and shouldn’t be in place. You can’t just say, that’ll do, it’s too hard or expensive to do this properly, so let’s not.
Amazon is one of the wealthiest companies in the world and could easily manually moderate channels before auto-banning them. As consumers we don’t have to accept these excuses for substandard services.
- Spivak 6y agoI don’t get this. The entire point of these systems is to detect and stop copyright violations because they open up platforms to lawsuits. It’s not enough to just respond to DMCA takedowns after the lawsuit between Viacom and YouTube because (I think pretty reasonably personally) these platforms previously enabled copyright violations at a scale that literally could not be policed by copyright holders and so ContentID and the like was the compromise.