I don't get the downvotes, but whatever. Is it really hard to believe that the watchdog group in question really hasn't considered that there is a difference be

I don't get the downvotes, but whatever. Is it really hard to believe that the watchdog group in question really hasn't considered that there is a difference between "blurring 100% of faces" and "blurring is performed manually?" It's likely they think that, if you force Google to perform manual blurring, then every face they photograph will be blurred. It's even more likely we've already thought about this issue far more than they have.