3 ms·
Thank you for the note, I suspected as much but I do appreciate your elaboration on the topic. I don’t agree with the approach (I would say for submissions tha
by abhinav22 6y ago
Thank you for the note, I suspected as much but I do appreciate your elaboration on the topic.
I don’t agree with the approach (I would say for submissions that don’t have as many upvotes that somebody who took the time to write a thank you note reflects they actually read the article and it was worth the effort to write a note (which takes more effort than an upvote). This can be a important signal for others. It also I think is a nice feedback to the author, I always want to try and encourage people — when I receive positive feedback, it makes my day).
In some ways it’s a reflection of how the community (at large, not any individual in particular) views itself — to be such stringent guardians of information density, when in fact a large portion of the comments are relatively useless and misinformed (usually the most knowledgeable people speak less as they are busy actually working in their field, although they pop up from time to time).
However, when in Rome, do as the romans do.
- DJBunnies 6y agoHn is fickle/edits titles, which is editorializing. Just the way it is.
- nindalf 6y agoImagine if half the comments in a thread were "thanks" or "this!" It would make the discussion worse, even if it makes individuals happier.
- abhinav22 6y agoFair enough I guess
- tempestn 6y agoWhat I try to do in those cases is find something to say about the content itself. Could even include the 'thanks' that way if you wanted. Like, "Thanks, I didn't realize that <interesting thing learned from the post>." That way you're at least contributing by drawing people's attention to an interesting part of the original article.