There is a difference between "allowed to" and "ought to". It's a question of ethics, not law. In my opinion it feels immoral for someone who has this much con

There is a difference between "allowed to" and "ought to". It's a question of ethics, not law. In my opinion it feels immoral for someone who has this much control over human interaction to act in a way that undermines free discourse so blatantly. To see an American company ignore the value of free speech is disheartening to me. YouTube is so popular and I wish they took a different stance on these issues.