This is speculation. It is not an interview with the decision makers at Slack. It's an opinion piece. We definitely could do a better job of "championing the

This is speculation. It is not an interview with the decision makers at Slack. It's an opinion piece. We definitely could do a better job of "championing the little guy." But the title here -- which is not as click-baity as the actual title, is something I experienced as misleading. I expected this to be an interview with someone in the know, not speculation by an outsider based on previous public statements. You can infer a lot based on public statements, but there may be things that weren't being said publicly. It can be impossible to know "the real motive" behind something without a direct statement by the person who made the decision.