4 ms·
But that's not democracy. Go is arguing that free speech is required for democracy, and that democracy is why we want free speech. The founders didn't like de
by 8note 6y ago
But that's not democracy.
Go is arguing that free speech is required for democracy, and that democracy is why we want free speech.
The founders didn't like democracy all that much though
- gnusty_gnurc 6y ago> and that democracy is why we want free speech We don't "want free speech," it exists and a government that represents free people will recognize that. The founders arrived at a consensus with representative democracy. They realized the dangers of democracy.
- 8note 6y agoIt's just a made up concept though. It would be physically impossible for YouTube to ban anything if it was a real thing. That there's a conversation about YouTube censoring people says that it is perfectly possible for free speech to not exist. It's not a physical law of the universe