4 ms·
You needn't have bothered. You shared a highly speculative piece which seemed to not mention the Pfizer vaccine at all, which largely said the opposite of what
by henryaj 6y ago
You needn't have bothered. You shared a highly speculative piece which seemed to not mention the Pfizer vaccine at all, which largely said the opposite of what you are saying (i.e. the Oxford vaccine reduced both symptomatic and asymptomatic infections) and had one quote talking about a "worst case scenario" in which that might not be true.
And you shared it 8 times, which is 8 times too many.
- jolmg 6y agoI see 3, but even if it were 8 at some point, it'd just be 7 times too many at best. Saying 8 times is just shutting-up a perfectly valid comment.
- henryaj 6y agoMy point was that it wasn't a perfectly valid comment.
- h3cate 6y agoSomebody else posted link about quote from Pfizer chairman saying it's completely unknown if transmission continues after vaccination. Happy to read any evidence either way