3 ms·
On the bright side, at least she isn't in the FCC, biasing the decision with more corruption, right? Or has the damage been done, and is irreversible?
by orijing 15y ago
On the bright side, at least she isn't in the FCC, biasing the decision with more corruption, right?
Or has the damage been done, and is irreversible?
- 18pfsmt 15y agoExcept he is a she, and she[1] is married to the son of former chief of staff, James Baker[2]. [1]http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/54765.html http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/54765.html [2]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Baker http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Baker
- orijing 15y agoGood find. Guess the revolving door never stops.
- drivebyacct2 15y agoAside from the fact that... she still is in the FCC. At least for a few more days/weeks. Good thing she doesn't have a conflict of interest.