I was not comparing PH to cash. It was not a metaphor. The parent of my comment has the following reasoning: 1) If a model has a fundamental flaw that allows

I was not comparing PH to cash. It was not a metaphor. The parent of my comment has the following reasoning: 1) If a model has a fundamental flaw that allows horrible things to persist despite their effort, the whole thing should be shut down. 2) PH has a model that allows horrible things to persist despite their effort 3) Therefore, PH should shut themselves down My cash example was a counter-example to 1). I was not saying that PH should definitely not be shutdown, but that the manner the parent came to such a conclusion was flawed. Specifically for PH, we don't know exactly what's happening on their servers. How many illegal videos have been taken down? How many fell through the cracks? How many accounts have been banned? That's why I suggested that PH should be challenged in court, where evidence can be presented and an informed conclusion can be made. Otherwise, you are not weighing severity against benefits; you are just weighing your intuitions.