3 ms·
Did we read the same article? Let’s be explicit and instead of talking about sales tax which the article claims sometimes acts like VAT and sometimes like a gr
by dan-robertson 6y ago
Did we read the same article?
Let’s be explicit and instead of talking about sales tax which the article claims sometimes acts like VAT and sometimes like a gross receipts tax and instead use those terms explicitly.
In the gross receipts tax regime, tax is applied at every boundary between businesses and so having fewer of these boundaries (ie being vertically integrated) gives a lower final price with workers receiving equal pay. In this way, the tax system incentives vertical integration.
In the VAT regime, the final price and total tax paid is the same whether or not the business is vertically integrated, and so the tax system doesn’t incentivise one option over the other.
The key point is that we first compare two competing business structures under the same tax system, and it turns out the tax rate doesn’t affect the argument so long as it’s positive, and then we compare how those structures relate to each other in different tax systems (where the rates don’t matter because they don’t change the relationship between the structures that both live under the same rate)
- giantg2 6y agoIf you mean the poorly presented one, then yes. The gross receipts structure is used instead of business income tax in some areas and is a separate thing from sales tax. Conflating the two doesn't help anything. The author's link to support the structure that collects sales tax at every step is really gross receipts. Perhaps there's a better site with a good example and a link to a sales tax structure that exists as they depict it in this article. Even if it did work that way, the primary drivers for vertical integration would be the option to shrink the margins at each step and supply chain control (quality, moating, etc). Is there an article discussing the differences in policies and rates of vertical integration between counties and the effects of it? It might be better to show that, rather than this article.