No, it isn't. It states the issue at hand and gives the facts available to us. The item you've linked (the filing by the Texas AG against Pennsylvania, Georgia

No, it isn't. It states the issue at hand and gives the facts available to us. The item you've linked (the filing by the Texas AG against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin) is weird. It seems to think there's some serious difference between mail-in and absentee voting in GA. In GA, the term absentee voting encompasses both early voting and mail in voting. The only absentee voting that has signature verification is the mail-in component (IDs are checked instead for early voting). And it appears to make the same "error" you've continued to make: it conflates rejection for signature mismatch and rejection for all reasons, when the signature mismatch rejections are a subset of all reasons.