This kind of attitude seems to be more of a "religious" approach than I'd like. For me, personally, the more opposing opinions I can obtain and comprehend, the

This kind of attitude seems to be more of a "religious" approach than I'd like. For me, personally, the more opposing opinions I can obtain and comprehend, the better my bounding limits on a topic can be. Even if you really despise someone's personal or political beliefs, how does it benefit you to not fully understand their claims? In Canada, we have an almost total blackout on interpretations of data that don't match the primary political party's desires and beliefs. They fund these "journalistic" organizations to the tune of billions of dollars, completely locking out any organizations with contrary opinions. Is it your belief that this an ideal situation for Canadians wishing to discover if there exist alternative viewpoints consistent with the available data?