3 ms·
So my takeaway from this article is more or less these are expensive, heavy, great quality, and have great sound. We already know Apple's noise cancellation and
by ogre_codes 6y ago
So my takeaway from this article is more or less these are expensive, heavy, great quality, and have great sound. We already know Apple's noise cancellation and transparency mode are pretty damned good from the AirPods Pro.
If these were about $200 less, I'd probably have pulled the trigger on these already. At $550, it's a pretty tough pill to swallow when fundamentally there are some damned good ANC headphones for quite a bit less.
For the moment anyhow, I don't watch TV on my iPad or phone enough for spatial audio to matter. So the only big features which make it stand above much more affordable competitors is: transparency mode, easy source switching, and overall niceness. Worth $200?? I kind of think no. Maybe I'll revisit this when more reviews are in and the wait time is less than 3 months to order them.
Edit: Gruber also mentioned this, but worth noting. They would be a lot more appealing if the Apple TV supported spatial audio.
- MengerSponge 6y agoI imagine transparency mode could be really nice in an office setting, or at an airport or something. Not particularly relevant these days, but I can see that changing over the lifespan of the product.
- ogre_codes 6y agoMy father in law has terribly bad hearing. He often watches TV with headphones on. I could see him wearing these with the volume cranked and transparency on so he can hear when other people talk to him. IMO transparency mode is perhaps the most interesting thing about these and the AirPods Pro.