I'm sceptical. > Using the mathematical tools available to him at the time, Einstein was able to better explain certain physical phenomena and also resolve a l

I'm sceptical. > Using the mathematical tools available to him at the time, Einstein was able to better explain certain physical phenomena and also resolve a longstanding paradox relating to inertia and gravity. But instead of improving on particles or waves, he eliminated them as he proposed the warping of space and time. > Using newer mathematical tools, my colleague and I have demonstrated a new theory that may accurately describe the universe. Instead of basing the theory on the warping of space and time, we considered that there could be a building block that is more fundamental than the particle and the wave. Scientists understand that particles and waves are existential opposites: A particle is a source of matter that exists at a single point, and waves exist everywhere except at the points that create them. My colleague and I thought it made logical sense for there to be an underlying connection between them. Link to the study (paywall) and abstract: https://physicsessays.org/browse-journal-2/product/1829-14-larry-m-silverberg-and-jeffrey-w-eischen-on-a-new-field-theory-formulation-and-a-space-time-adjustment-that-predict-the-same-precession-of-mercury-and-the-same-bending-of-light-as-general-relativity.html https://physicsessays.org/browse-journal-2/product/1829-14-l...