3 ms·

The Scorpions - Virgin Killer (the original one especially)?

by ununoctium87 6y ago

boobsbr 6y ago
Am I on a list now for having looked at that?
- meowster 6y ago
  There are so many lists these days, it should be more suspicious if you're not on any lists.
  - NikolaeVarius 6y ago
    If you're not on at least 2 lists, you have a boring life.
enriquto 6y ago
It's actually a good cover. Extremely disturbing, and artsy at the same time.
- kevinmchugh 6y ago
  It's a photo of a nude 10 year old.
  - enriquto 6y ago
    > It's a photo of a nude 10 year old. Sure, objectively there's nothing wrong with that. The problem is that the kid is in a very unlikely position for a child; and then the broken glass effect is terrifying. It gives me an extremely uneasy, disgusting, feeling. On the other hand, I acknowledge that the composition is quite masterful. Thus, it is a work of art that does not leave you indifferent, and you remember it for a long time after having seen it. I guess that makes it a very good, unforgettable cover for a music album.
    - AdmiralAsshat 6y ago
      Might be a regional thing. I suppose in Europe, the nudity could denote innocence, but in the US, my immediate takeaway of a nude prepubescent child on the cover of an album called "Virgin Killer" would suggest that she was a victim of sexual violence before being murdered (particularly since the broken glass is right over the genitalia). So I'd probably argue it's simply in poor taste.
      - ce4 6y ago
        It's bad taste especially that it was used as a means to drive controversy and the song was basically constructed around the title also. But it is not about killing, instead one of the band members stated that "Virgin Killer is none other than the demon of our time, the less compassionate side of the societies we live in today—brutally trampling upon the heart and soul of innocence." [0]. Apparently the Band regrets it today and there's more background info and apparently there was a big Wikipedia shitstorm in 2008 about removing the artwork or not which led to some sort of edit ban in the UK [1]. [0]: https://web.archive.org/web/20100509235302/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=50508 https://web.archive.org/web/20100509235302/http://www.roadru... [1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_Killer#Artwork https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_Killer#Artwork
        AdmiralAsshat 6y ago
        As I said, though, there were any number of other ways you could have visually portrayed childhood innocence. The same model wearing early-childhood styled clothing, or barefoot with a flower garland around her head, would have conveyed the same message. The band was either naive or willfully blind to the use of nudity purely to be "edgy".

The Scorpions - Virgin Killer (the original one especially)?

boobsbr 6y ago

Am I on a list now for having looked at that?

meowster 6y ago
There are so many lists these days, it should be more suspicious if you're not on any lists.
- NikolaeVarius 6y ago
  If you're not on at least 2 lists, you have a boring life.

enriquto 6y ago

It's actually a good cover. Extremely disturbing, and artsy at the same time.

kevinmchugh 6y ago
It's a photo of a nude 10 year old.
- enriquto 6y ago
  > It's a photo of a nude 10 year old. Sure, objectively there's nothing wrong with that. The problem is that the kid is in a very unlikely position for a child; and then the broken glass effect is terrifying. It gives me an extremely uneasy, disgusting, feeling. On the other hand, I acknowledge that the composition is quite masterful. Thus, it is a work of art that does not leave you indifferent, and you remember it for a long time after having seen it. I guess that makes it a very good, unforgettable cover for a music album.
  - AdmiralAsshat 6y ago
    Might be a regional thing. I suppose in Europe, the nudity could denote innocence, but in the US, my immediate takeaway of a nude prepubescent child on the cover of an album called "Virgin Killer" would suggest that she was a victim of sexual violence before being murdered (particularly since the broken glass is right over the genitalia). So I'd probably argue it's simply in poor taste.
    - ce4 6y ago
      It's bad taste especially that it was used as a means to drive controversy and the song was basically constructed around the title also. But it is not about killing, instead one of the band members stated that "Virgin Killer is none other than the demon of our time, the less compassionate side of the societies we live in today—brutally trampling upon the heart and soul of innocence." [0]. Apparently the Band regrets it today and there's more background info and apparently there was a big Wikipedia shitstorm in 2008 about removing the artwork or not which led to some sort of edit ban in the UK [1]. [0]: https://web.archive.org/web/20100509235302/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=50508 https://web.archive.org/web/20100509235302/http://www.roadru... [1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_Killer#Artwork https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_Killer#Artwork
      - AdmiralAsshat 6y ago
        As I said, though, there were any number of other ways you could have visually portrayed childhood innocence. The same model wearing early-childhood styled clothing, or barefoot with a flower garland around her head, would have conveyed the same message. The band was either naive or willfully blind to the use of nudity purely to be "edgy".