3 ms·
The point is not that they don’t have positives; but that they don’t pay for themselves. If you want to live in a cul de sac you should at least pay more in ta
by tjr225 6y ago
The point is not that they don’t have positives; but that they don’t pay for themselves.
If you want to live in a cul de sac you should at least pay more in taxes to keep up the inefficient infrastructure you require for your lifestyle.
Ironically it seems the people that live in cul de sacs feel like they should pay less in taxes for some reason even though the public infrastructure that is required to maintain the positives they enjoy costs more and is inefficient.
- teeray 6y agoSometimes HOAs basically account for that. New streets in some cities and towns are made responsible for their roads, culverts, sewer, etc. HOAs can be good all the way down to horrific, sure, but when they’re good things typically get addressed quicker than they would waiting for the municipality to get around to it.