The articles thesis is that low sensory housing is financially unsustainable because infrastructure isn't paid for. Cul de sac may be better qol than other low

The articles thesis is that low sensory housing is financially unsustainable because infrastructure isn't paid for. Cul de sac may be better qol than other low density housing, but that doesn't make them more sustainable. And a walkable urban neighborhood with a nearby park avoids the issue. Saying cul de sacs are necessary for suburbs doesn't address the "suburbs are bad" claim.