> Btw, poor people lacking influence is not consistent with how quite a lot of European nobles died I believe people dying (noble or otherwise) is the recurrin

> Btw, poor people lacking influence is not consistent with how quite a lot of European nobles died I believe people dying (noble or otherwise) is the recurring historical singularity we're trying to avoid; so we can both acknowledge that the poor can violently and quite temporarily gain political advantage while recognizing that during non-singular time periods (which is most of time) the converse is generally true.