It's total rejection rate to total rejection, so that's apples-to-apples, right? It is interesting that the GA SoS claims rejections in 2016 due to signatures

It's total rejection rate to total rejection, so that's apples-to-apples, right? It is interesting that the GA SoS claims rejections in 2016 due to signatures was really low. If that's true and 2020 is comparable, then we would not expect to see a significant number bogus signatures in an audit, which would provide reassurance to all observers. Hence, in that case, I don't understand the reluctance to perform an audit.