3 ms·

1. Opportunities for timely feedback (in both directions) 2. Concerns/issues 3. General chat Most people forget the third option. It’s OK if it’s just time t

1. Opportunities for timely feedback (in both directions) 2. Concerns/issues 3. General chat Most people forget the third option. It’s OK if it’s just time to hang out with each other. That said, it’s your meeting more than it is your manager’s. If you want to cancel, you should. However, frequent cancellation is a signal of a problem to my mind. As a manager, the only thing more frustrating than a 1:1 which is like pulling teeth, is a 1:1 with somebody who doesn’t want to communicate at all.

deleted 6y ago
[deleted]
houseofzeus 6y ago
I think what gets lost is that it's your 1:1, not the manager's. Same when you go to a skip level. If they are the one driving the agenda it is indeed probably going to be a waste of time. This cartoon is a useful prompter for different things to think about going into them: https://twitter.com/b0rk/status/1037186572234498048?lang=en https://twitter.com/b0rk/status/1037186572234498048?lang=en
- war1025 6y ago
  So looking at that list, We have group meetings to cover the majority of: - What's going well - What's not going well - Team priorities - Brainstorm My boss in general doesn't really give feedback. And the answers "Ask for opportunities", "Career Planning", and "Ask for extra resources" is basically, "This is the job, if you want something else, go find a new job" I did manage to get a raise and a few extra responsibilities by going out and getting a job offer at a different company. I think probably the real answer is that my job is a dead end and probably an unhealthy environment to have spent so much time in. But also I have outstanding work-life balance, which is my highest priority at the moment with three young kids at home. In a couple years maybe that changes.
cactus2093 6y ago
Except in unusual circumstances, I normally find that #1 and #2 don't change much on the one or two week cadence that 1:1s usually happen. Every couple months there might be a significant amount of time spent on one of these, and then there might be a few check-ins on that afterwards, but in most cases it's not anywhere near enough time to fill a 30 minute slot every 2 weeks. I also at some point personally started making a conscious effort to spend less time on #2, bringing up concerns/issues. Nine times out of ten nothing will come out of it anyway (most things are out of your manager's control), and nobody likes a complainer. Your effort is better spent practicing meditation, or else applying to new jobs if things are really bad, rather than spending half an hour every week "voicing concerns" in a 1:1. That basically leaves a large majority of 1:1 time spent on #3, which I totally agree with the parent comment gets awkward after a while. I have started wonder if the 1:1 in tech is an "emperor has no clothes" type of situation. Am I so unusual? Or do we all just go along pretending that these are super essential to a functional team, while in practice not much really ever comes of them?

deleted 6y ago

[deleted]

houseofzeus 6y ago

I think what gets lost is that it's your 1:1, not the manager's. Same when you go to a skip level. If they are the one driving the agenda it is indeed probably going to be a waste of time. This cartoon is a useful prompter for different things to think about going into them: https://twitter.com/b0rk/status/1037186572234498048?lang=en https://twitter.com/b0rk/status/1037186572234498048?lang=en

war1025 6y ago
So looking at that list, We have group meetings to cover the majority of: - What's going well - What's not going well - Team priorities - Brainstorm My boss in general doesn't really give feedback. And the answers "Ask for opportunities", "Career Planning", and "Ask for extra resources" is basically, "This is the job, if you want something else, go find a new job" I did manage to get a raise and a few extra responsibilities by going out and getting a job offer at a different company. I think probably the real answer is that my job is a dead end and probably an unhealthy environment to have spent so much time in. But also I have outstanding work-life balance, which is my highest priority at the moment with three young kids at home. In a couple years maybe that changes.

cactus2093 6y ago

Except in unusual circumstances, I normally find that #1 and #2 don't change much on the one or two week cadence that 1:1s usually happen. Every couple months there might be a significant amount of time spent on one of these, and then there might be a few check-ins on that afterwards, but in most cases it's not anywhere near enough time to fill a 30 minute slot every 2 weeks. I also at some point personally started making a conscious effort to spend less time on #2, bringing up concerns/issues. Nine times out of ten nothing will come out of it anyway (most things are out of your manager's control), and nobody likes a complainer. Your effort is better spent practicing meditation, or else applying to new jobs if things are really bad, rather than spending half an hour every week "voicing concerns" in a 1:1. That basically leaves a large majority of 1:1 time spent on #3, which I totally agree with the parent comment gets awkward after a while. I have started wonder if the 1:1 in tech is an "emperor has no clothes" type of situation. Am I so unusual? Or do we all just go along pretending that these are super essential to a functional team, while in practice not much really ever comes of them?