4 ms·
That seems like a ridiculously high number to me.
by mrkurt 18y ago
That seems like a ridiculously high number to me.
- ashleyw 18y agoMaybe, but its a very well known online brand name, its only going to keep growing. Though as it grows it has less and less tech stuff and more and more mainstream content, but I guess from the standpoint of investors that is only a good thing. Tech people don't like ads and even go as far as blocking them, non-techies don't (or are less likely too). It would be a good investment, and I would hope it goes to Google rather than Microsoft, AOL, or any other company who will seek to change it in a major way.
- henning 18y agoSo what is it worth? Once you get into numbers that high, how do you even make a reasonable decision?
- Retric 18y agoWhat are the odds it will make Google 20million a year profit starting today or 40million a year profit in 5 years. Granted you need to add in indirect profit but Digg has been going down hill for a while so they need to recover 300+ million within 10 years or it's a bad investment IMO.
- greendestiny 18y agoI think a lot of people underestimate the value of web front pages. Capitalising on them has been a mixed bag but Digg has been around for a while.
- rbanffy 18y agoIsn't Digg using Microsoft for their ads? I wouldn't like to be a chair in Redmond now.
- jm4 18y agoUgh... I thought I was done reading stupid chair jokes when I left Slashdot...