Seems MasterCard just did not want to continue business with that customer, and I suppose others in the same "entertainment" sector, be it a corporate decision

Seems MasterCard just did not want to continue business with that customer, and I suppose others in the same "entertainment" sector, be it a corporate decision or through external pressures to so. Should alleged "unlawful content" be cited there should be throughout proofs (through formal jurisdictional procedure), otherwise I do not see how this is not defamation. These !accusations are quite a growing phenomenon with service providers I believe.