2 ms·
Because it might help limit easy, mass distribution of child molestation, rape, etc. videos.
by cwwc 6y ago
Because it might help limit easy, mass distribution of child molestation, rape, etc. videos.
- fastball 6y agoI dunno, seems like the vast, vast majority of "for the children" initiatives rarely end up accomplishing what they say they will, and mostly just end up limiting the freedom of people totally blameless in such things.
- hshshs2 6y agowouldn’t they just use any of the private existing methods of distributing it, like facebook? I can’t imagine the audience for posting publicly accessible child pornography is larger than “private” mediums? probably impossible to know? wouldn’t it also be easier to track down illegal pornography and the people behind it if it’s being posted in the open? I think this is something that might feel and sound better than it really is... but it’s hard to argue against it without being labeled as in support of exploitation (which i am against, to be clear)
- odessacubbage 6y agothis will do nothing to stop that, what it will do is further empower banks, fintech and chokepoint monopolies to curtail what speech and whose business is allowed on the internet in a manner that just so happens to to completely appeal to the whims of anti-queer, anti-sex, anti sexworker moralists in the halls of power. i have never met an extremely online anti-pedo person who wasn't the most specious kind of kony2012 virtue signaller.