3 ms·
I don't think you needed the snark. I was responding directly to the comment which says that a monopoly is not defined by market share. But that is exactly what
by frereubu 6y ago
I don't think you needed the snark. I was responding directly to the comment which says that a monopoly is not defined by market share. But that is exactly what a monopoly is defined as - it's the "mono" part in the word. If what the parent comment was talking about is not a monopoly, then they could have said that and pointed out what it is instead.
- mthoms 6y agoThe snark was uncalled for indeed. But keep in mind that there are legal definitions of some things, and those often differ greatly from the colloquial definitions we use from day-to-day.