I thought it was a step beyond that? Market dominance paired with leveraging that dominance in a way that hurts consumers. If it’s levered in a way that doesn

I thought it was a step beyond that? Market dominance paired with leveraging that dominance in a way that hurts consumers. If it’s levered in a way that doesn’t hurt consumers, that may be hyper competitive and other businesses may not like it, but that’s not a monopoly abuse. At least that’s my layman’s understanding of the law. Apple’s behavior is arguably good for most users (restricting tracking/spying). I don’t think Apple’s behavior meets that consumer harm standard.