4 ms·
There is nothing anti-privacy about an 'account'. Someone having an arbitrary email address doesn't constitute a breach of privacy. Downloading games is greatl
by jariel 6y ago
There is nothing anti-privacy about an 'account'. Someone having an arbitrary email address doesn't constitute a breach of privacy.
Downloading games is greatly enhanced by accounts.
Playing most games require accounts.
Banning cheaters effectively requires accounts.
It's 100% perfectly fine and there is nothing wrong with it.
The hyperbole here gets really tiring after a while.
- tpxl 6y ago> Playing most games require accounts. No it does not. Most games are not multiplayer games and don't require accounts. > Downloading games is greatly enhanced by accounts. It's greatly enhanced by accounts _with the application vendor_ not the device manufacturer. I'd be quite upset if AMD required an account to be able to download Steam games. I _was_ quite upset when a(n offline only) game I bought on Steam required a Games for Windows Live account I didn't was. > There is nothing anti-privacy about an 'account'. Someone having an arbitrary email address doesn't constitute a breach of privacy. I said anti-consumer, not anti-privacy. Online only is also cancer, which is what requiring an account effectively is.