3 ms·
XBox and Occulus have no absolutely no reason to be services. Requiring accounts for no reason is anti-consumer and therefore evil. Of course online stores re
by tpxl 6y ago
XBox and Occulus have no absolutely no reason to be services. Requiring accounts for no reason is anti-consumer and therefore evil.
Of course online stores require accounts, but those are not required to use the hardware.
- jariel 6y agoThere is nothing anti-privacy about an 'account'. Someone having an arbitrary email address doesn't constitute a breach of privacy. Downloading games is greatly enhanced by accounts. Playing most games require accounts. Banning cheaters effectively requires accounts. It's 100% perfectly fine and there is nothing wrong with it. The hyperbole here gets really tiring after a while.
- tpxl 6y ago> Playing most games require accounts. No it does not. Most games are not multiplayer games and don't require accounts. > Downloading games is greatly enhanced by accounts. It's greatly enhanced by accounts _with the application vendor_ not the device manufacturer. I'd be quite upset if AMD required an account to be able to download Steam games. I _was_ quite upset when a(n offline only) game I bought on Steam required a Games for Windows Live account I didn't was. > There is nothing anti-privacy about an 'account'. Someone having an arbitrary email address doesn't constitute a breach of privacy. I said anti-consumer, not anti-privacy. Online only is also cancer, which is what requiring an account effectively is.