> enabling it by default ultimately led to it being completely meaningless No, DNT was completely meaningless from the moment it was proposed. Enabling it by d

> enabling it by default ultimately led to it being completely meaningless No, DNT was completely meaningless from the moment it was proposed. Enabling it by default was just Microsoft pointing out that the emperor had no clothes. I don't even agree with you that it was well-intentioned; IMO it was a bad faith effort to push a non-fix, to try and hoodwink people into not calling for regulation and/or technical solutions with actual teeth. Solutions which require cooperation from hostile attackers (i.e. advertisers) are not solutions.