4 ms·
The numbers are comparing apples and oranges: https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-georgia-rejected-ballots-fo/fact-check-georgia-rejected-ballots-did-
by VikingCoder 6y ago
The numbers are comparing apples and oranges:
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-georgia-rejected-ballots-fo/fact-check-georgia-rejected-ballots-did-not-go-from-4-to-almost-zero-in-2020-idUSKBN2832CM https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-georgia-rejecte...
> If GA wanted to build confidence in these results, I would recommend at least uploading a copy of all accepted ballot envelope signatures along with the on-file registration signature.
...wouldn't that make it far easier for some malicious to steal the signature of thousands of people? Perhaps in the 2022 midterms or 2024 general election?
- dilap 6y agoIt's total rejection rate to total rejection, so that's apples-to-apples, right? It is interesting that the GA SoS claims rejections in 2016 due to signatures was really low. If that's true and 2020 is comparable, then we would not expect to see a significant number bogus signatures in an audit, which would provide reassurance to all observers. Hence, in that case, I don't understand the reluctance to perform an audit.