4 ms·
Serious question: why not just open another terminal?
by garmaine 6y ago
Serious question: why not just open another terminal?
- AdamGibbins 6y agoThe integration is nice, it behaves as a normal buffer. So you can use all the standard modes and motions, splits, copy output to another buffer easier etc.
- garmaine 6y agoBut modern terminals can do all that, with an editing mode that is tailored to terminal use rather than editing text. Sorry I just don't understand why I'd want to use a text editor as my command line.
- AdamGibbins 6y agoThey can't though, a modern terminal cannot behave as a vim buffer. You can't have 25% of your terminal as a shell and the other 75% vim, they can't split like that. I'm not aware of any terminal that allows integration with vim registers or use vim motions.
- renewiltord 6y agoYou can use it as a normal buffer. Run command, switch to visual, go copy and paste. Way nicer than `:r !command`.