3 ms·
Nothing in that definition contradicts my usage. If you can see a semantic difference between their examples and mine, please explain it. And, the only person
by zepto 6y ago
Nothing in that definition contradicts my usage. If you can see a semantic difference between their examples and mine, please explain it.
And, the only person saying that Apple is a forced choice, is you. That isn’t a given. It is a conclusion you want us to agree with.
This is an attempt at ‘affirming the consequent’, I.e. your argument assumes your conclusion to be true, which is a fallacy.
I have to assume you know this.
- fsflover 6y ago> Nothing in that definition contradicts my usage. At the same time, nothing in that definition contradicts my usage, too. > And, the only person saying that Apple is a forced choice, is you. That isn’t a given. This is a given. When you only have just two options, and one of them is openly anti-privacy, anti-consumer, it's clear that the other option is a forced choice. I am far from the first person to say that about Apple.