6 ms·
> What other motive would a country have to be in the EU, barring ostensibly moralistic arguments, which in themselves will be made with economic motives? The
by dcolkitt 6y ago
> What other motive would a country have to be in the EU, barring ostensibly moralistic arguments, which in themselves will be made with economic motives?
The original purpose of the European Coal and Steel Community was to neutralize the risk of repeating World War II by tying the major continental powers into a commercial union. The ostensible purpose was economic integration, but the ultimate purpose was geopolitical harmony.
In contrast Thatcher envisioned the EU as a purely commercial arrangement, designed to counterbalance the UK's loss of global economic relevance in the face of decolonization. The difference in vision was a major source of conflict between Thatcher and her continental counterparts. They only reached a compromise because Thatcher was concerned about a newly unified Germany having too much power without Britain in the union.
- jpcooper 6y agoThanks for the explanation. That puts a different spin on things. Geopolitical harmony as a defence against other external powers. I've focussed on the economy, but what I should have said is national interests.
- stkdump 6y agoNational interests quickly expand to interests of your neighbors and the rest of the world unless your interest is strengthening/widening hierarchies and power differential even inside your own nation (in which case you need a system of manipulation of the masses)
- jpcooper 6y agoYes. Interests of one player may correlate positively with those of others.