3 ms·
Good point. The issue I have with water futures in particular is two fold: It solidifies the notion of privately owned water sources in a general sense: That's
by dgb23 6y ago
Good point. The issue I have with water futures in particular is two fold:
It solidifies the notion of privately owned water sources in a general sense: That's too much "free market" for my taste and goes against my ethical disposition.
Secondly it doesn't solve any problems and challenges. The incentive here is to profit from making market predictions. No more, no less.
There are more balanced approaches to handle water distribution. Via public commissions and regulated use for example.
- Kalium 6y ago> Secondly it doesn't solve any problems and challenges. The incentive here is to profit from making market predictions. No more, no less. For many people, it allows them to get price stability. It means that, for the length of a growing season, they can have water at a known price and not be vulnerable to price swings. IMO, that does address a real challenge or problem faced by real people. Especially in agricultural places where water markets already exist, like California. I think you're right, though. There must be a better way to handle this. I'd love to hear about realistic ways to reform California's water rights system!