> through a lens of historical data You keep saying "historical data" as if that should make everyone node their head in agreement: "hmmm, yes, yes, you're rig

> through a lens of historical data You keep saying "historical data" as if that should make everyone node their head in agreement: "hmmm, yes, yes, you're right, historical data". I'd love to see the "historical data" you allude to. > but you’re looking at it through a different lens Nope. I'm looking through the same lens: history tells us that couriers are underpaid and overworked, especially in the US. And they keep being underpaid and underworked with DoorDash and other vultures. You pretend that DoorDash is somehow good.