It seems like a poor business decision to be so heavy handed on this. They have made it black and white where a shade of gray would've been much better. For ins

It seems like a poor business decision to be so heavy handed on this. They have made it black and white where a shade of gray would've been much better. For instance, they could leave the videos accessible but exclude them from their recommendations engine or apply a "misinformation" ranking factor that will be in effect for those videos. Now that they're disallowing videos containing this information, why wouldn't broader Google exclude from web search webpages containing the same misinformation? What is the principle that applies to videos about this topic that doesn't apply to webpages about this topic? I don't agree at all that the US election was rigged, but removing this content entirely still feels heavy handed when they could continue to be a platform for it, but without pushing/recommending it.