3 ms·
wow, that's the "non proliferation" argument. it's the first time I see it applied since the cold war. I guess I should have expected it. it's the nuclear warhe
by slim 6y ago
wow, that's the "non proliferation" argument. it's the first time I see it applied since the cold war. I guess I should have expected it. it's the nuclear warhead equivalent argument when you're justifying a monoply