3 ms·
The issue with the WSJ is the editorial board and the obvious mutual contempt between them and the news side. It’s not uncommon for the editorial board to run w
by ashtonkem 6y ago
The issue with the WSJ is the editorial board and the obvious mutual contempt between them and the news side. It’s not uncommon for the editorial board to run whackadoodle stuff that ends up being ripped to pieces by the news staff.
NYT in my eyes appears to be of quite low quality, but I don’t have enough history with them to figure out if this is a new trend or not.
- panarky 6y agoDo you have some links to what you consider to be high quality journalism?
- ashtonkem 6y agoAlas, no. I typically cross compare against multiple publications, along with the knowledge of what the short-comings and biases of each source might be.
- monoideism 6y agoHere's a pretty good one from NBC news: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EYjG4uequWQ https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EYjG4uequWQ Just facts, no unnecessary ideology or opinions. Lets the viewer decide. Now, this isn't always the case with NBC News, but it often is. Most of 60 Minutes is another example of high quality journalism.
- raziel2701 6y agoThis focuses on finance and economics so maybe not what you're looking for: https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/ https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/