4 ms·
> "I want to put my thoughts out, but for as many people as possible to see them, and without caring about impact". I suppose I've interpreted the thought proc
by Shared404 6y ago
> "I want to put my thoughts out, but for as many people as possible to see them, and without caring about impact".
I suppose I've interpreted the thought process differently. I see it as "I'm going to put my thoughts out, maybe someone will find it interesting.", with the key difference of not caring about many people see/interact.
> at worst it might be a source of so much thoughtless/marginalizing content on Twitter: because the author did not care what their words will do to the reader.
Alternately, this could be caused by echo chambers where people scream endless affirmation at you because you said something that lines up with their political views.
Neither method of using Twitter is more wrong or more right, just different.
- TheRealNGenius 6y agoProps to both of you for keeping it civil. Genuinely interesting to see slightly opposing views work out through discussion - something that wouldn't be possible in a write-only scenario...
- Shared404 6y ago> Genuinely interesting to see slightly opposing views work out through discussion[.] One of the reasons HN is one of the few places I actually post on the internet. People here are generally willing to discuss in good faith. > something that wouldn't be possible in a write-only scenario... /me sighs yes. That was the whole point of the conversation, and why we are having this discussion in a forum designed for discussion, instead of in a platform that is equally designed for microblogging and discussion. In addition, it's perfectly possible to put contact info in your twitter bio. Someone is just as capable of looking at that and emailing you as they would be if you were blogging off your own website.