5 ms·
>Those who feel they are being censored can freely start their own AntiTube service. I'm pretty sure that's been tried, no? And then the same regressives have
by cmdshiftf4 6y ago
>Those who feel they are being censored can freely start their own AntiTube service.
I'm pretty sure that's been tried, no? And then the same regressives have ensured those services are:
- Deplatformed by infrastructure providers
- Stripped of support from payment providers
- Deindexed, banned from advertising, etc. from search engines
- Silenced on social media so as to not be able to get their brand / product out
But hey, I mean it's a free world, right? I, as an impartial observer free from any consequences, honestly welcome the US tech industry to continue backing half of the US population into a corner, and believe me I will spare the same industry not one iota of sympathy when those same people inevitably snap.
- wwright 6y agoDo you have any examples of that happening to people for actions that aren’t straight up pedophilia or racism (ie Stormfront)?
- Vecr 6y agoHate speech is free speech, in US law. Racism is absolutely protected.
- wwright 6y agoFree speech is about government laws, not private action. Racist speech is protected, but so is the right to not propagate racist speech on private infrastructure.
- derivagral 6y agoThis is what will lose them section 230 though, right? The bloc that "snaps" is going to vote, and those votes are going to have consequences.