3 ms·
But missing votes isn’t even evidence of fraud. Could be just an error. And from my knowledge I know for a fact that at least NPR reported the change in votes a
by anthony_romeo 6y ago
But missing votes isn’t even evidence of fraud. Could be just an error. And from my knowledge I know for a fact that at least NPR reported the change in votes and discussed it in commentary.
- filoleg 6y ago>But missing votes isn’t even evidence of fraud. Could be just an error. Important clarification, agreed, but that wasn't the point of my comment. The point was the retraction of "there are no missing votes, it is nonsense", and that is yet to happen afaik. I wasn't aware that NPR did it already, which is good. But I am still salty that it doesn't get nearly as much attention as the initial "we know for a fact there were no missing votes despite zero evidence one way or another" from a bit more "mainstream" publications like CNN and such. But I guess I am moving the goalpost at this point, because you are correct that one of the somewhat mainstream media publications indeed retracted their earlier statement.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- anthony_romeo 6y agoIf the point of your statement not about fraud, then why did you use the word “fraud” in your initial example? “Results of the election not changing isn't the point. It is the lack of retraction of the earlier "there was no election fraud" claim.”