5 ms·

Can you expend on how the process works in Australia. Genuinely curious. The 0.02% or the more recent 0.06% rejection rate is very low. Think of it this way.

Can you expend on how the process works in Australia. Genuinely curious. The 0.02% or the more recent 0.06% rejection rate is very low. Think of it this way. Out of 1000 people taking a test that needed two signatures, that matched. Only 2-6 did not not match. Thats an extremely low number. This is why teachers are always reminding students not to forget to sign their test, in a class of 30, and that only requires one signature. If you worked with the general public, and you asked them to tie their shoes, I honestly believe you would have a higher failure rate than 0.02%

nl 6y ago
> Out of 1000 people taking a test that needed two signatures, that matched. Only 2-6 did not not match. Thats an extremely low number. No that's not what it means. It means 2-6 were rejected. "Signature matching" is a junk process and should be ignored. In the AZ random sampling that the Judge asked for, 6/100 signatures were inconclusive, and this was on verified voters. > Can you expend on how the process works in Australia. Genuinely curious. https://www.aec.gov.au/faqs/postal-voting.htm https://www.aec.gov.au/faqs/postal-voting.htm You control the voting envelopes and ballot papers which is actually how fraud is controlled in the US too. The signature verification thing is nothing but ineffective security theatre.