Without A think tank for how fb should be split, this suit won’t succeed in court for no reason other than impracticality. Without sustaining rules there is no

Without A think tank for how fb should be split, this suit won’t succeed in court for no reason other than impracticality. Without sustaining rules there is nothing stopping another fb from coming in the future. Without rules and without a master roadmap, I can’t see the judge agreeing to this. Like sun tzu said the battle is won before the first shot is fired. And this is a losing battle. Here is what I think of an ideal future. Platforms need to be separated and service providers need to be separated. They can be one company but separate management with no influence between each other. Messaging platforms can be separate with interoperability. As long as management is separate. Facebook properties are a combination of friend network, share portal, news aggregator portal, ad display, ad filter, messaging platforms, data analyzers. And more than I care to know. This is too much power under one management. By splitting platforms from service providers seeking customers on those platforms, and allowing customers to disconnect from those platforms and move to other platforms, a large fracking sound will be heard.