11 ms·
>Funny how various US courts of law disagree with you and Rubio No they don't. >The information the SIC vol.5 regroups was used to convict quite a few of Trum
by tha0xa1 6y ago
>Funny how various US courts of law disagree with you and Rubio
No they don't.
>The information the SIC vol.5 regroups was used to convict quite a few of Trump's campaign associates.
Not for anything related to collision or election fraud.
- alwayseasy 6y agoRoger Stone.
- tha0xa1 6y agoNot for anything related to collision or election fraud.
- alwayseasy 6y agoAt some point you're either illiterate or don't want to know. Here's one of the convictions of Stone: https://www.axios.com/roger-stone-found-guilty-all-counts-9a18bed4-305d-4cc7-a839-61e1567542c9.html https://www.axios.com/roger-stone-found-guilty-all-counts-9a... I see it coming so don't come back with "he wasn't convicted of election fraud and collusion by the judge" because that's not how the US judicial system works. His crimes are clearly linked to the whole topic of Trump & Russians interfering in the 2016 election.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- ModernMech 6y ago> Not for anything related to collision or election fraud. Manafort was charged with crimes not related to Russian collusion in hopes of getting him to flip on Trump. It was working too, which is how Mueller’s team learned Manafort was feeding internal campaign to a Russian Intel officer, while Russia was waging a psyops campaign against American voters. This strikes at the heart of the collusion claims. That was until Trump started dangling the idea of a pardon and Manafort clammed up.