4 ms·
> Your original statement was: "the common view of "underpaid" being a view that isn't consistent with the history of the space." No wriggling. :) To me, that
by akarma 6y ago
> Your original statement was: "the common view of "underpaid" being a view that isn't consistent with the history of the space."
No wriggling. :)
To me, that statement would be backed by evidence that DoorDash allows drivers to make more than they previously made as drivers for specific restaurants.
To you, that wouldn’t satisfy the notion that they are fairly paid, because you believe they have always been underpaid.
I’m looking at “underpaid” through a lens of historical data, but you’re looking at it through a different lens, so I asked how you define underpaid.
Do you see what I mean?
- dmitriid 6y ago> through a lens of historical data You keep saying "historical data" as if that should make everyone node their head in agreement: "hmmm, yes, yes, you're right, historical data". I'd love to see the "historical data" you allude to. > but you’re looking at it through a different lens Nope. I'm looking through the same lens: history tells us that couriers are underpaid and overworked, especially in the US. And they keep being underpaid and underworked with DoorDash and other vultures. You pretend that DoorDash is somehow good.