The OP has: "Yesterday was the safe harbor deadline for the U.S. Presidential election and enough states have certified their election results to determine a P

The OP has: "Yesterday was the safe harbor deadline for the U.S. Presidential election and enough states have certified their election results to determine a President-elect. Given that, we will start removing any piece of content uploaded today (or anytime after) that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, in line with our approach towards historical U.S. Presidential elections." I've paid fairly close attention to the claims of fraud, and nowhere have I seen claims of "widespread fraud". It is simply that, just from some simple arithmetic, "widespread fraud" was not necessary to have "changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election". Instead it was quite sufficient to have fraud in one or two cities in just the six swing states PA, MI, WI, AZ, NV, and GA. Just 10 cities is enough, and that is not "widespread". For "Yesterday was the safe harbor deadline for the U.S. Presidential election and enough states have certified their election results to determine a President-elect." That statement is not the most important possible: Instead, what the states do to "certify" is not the last word. Instead there is in the Constitution: "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, ..." So, in each state, the legislature STILL has the final authority. Supposedly this point was tested in the SCOTUS in 1892 and 2000 or some such. Mayor Giuliani claims to have lots of solid evidence of fraud in the form of hundreds of signed affidavits in each of several of the six states and with enough fraud to have converted a Trump win to an apparent Biden win. By now legislatures in several of the six states have seen at least an overview of Giuliani's evidence. Still, AFAIK, no legislature has taken the Constitutional power to "direct" and "appoint" their state's electors. Some of those legislatures still could "direct" and "appoint". It appears that going directly to the state legislatures, that is, just f'getting about all the courts except possibly the SCOTUS, could be sufficient. The way I read the Constitution, each state legislature can take the power to "direct" and "appoint" without regard for the state constitution, the state laws, the state governor, secretary of state, AG, or board of elections and without need for the governor to *call the legislature into session". Net, anytime before the Electoral College votes, some states legislatures could still "appoint" electors that could cause Trump to win. If there was fraud that threw the election, then as citizens we darned better well get to the bottom of it before 1/20/2021. Some of the alleged fraud is just old fashioned ballot box stuffing. We really SHOULD be able to settle such claims solidly, for or against. Fraud that changes an election for POTUS is a threat to our rule of law, Constitution, democracy, and country. We need a solid answer. IMHO, Youtube should encourage full debate of these points. As it is, it appears that Youtube doesn't want videos of Trump, Giuliani, or Justices of the SCOTUS -- not so good.