Slow performance is always my impression with RAIDZ. There's an obvious performance hit if you are coming from conventional RAID setups (like mdadm). I've even

Slow performance is always my impression with RAIDZ. There's an obvious performance hit if you are coming from conventional RAID setups (like mdadm). I've even seen some unbelievable slow speed like 1 MiB/s in the middle of copying a large git repo (which have a lot of small files, repeated git pull also creates a lot of fragmentation). But my experience was based on early ZFSOnLinux, perhaps a real BSD will perform better. Anyway, I knew ZFS's first goal is data safety, not performance, and it's why I could tolerate the performance...