So I think you're right in the literal sense, but rainer is accurate in the sentiment. The media used the word 'interference' in an exaggerated and nefarious c

So I think you're right in the literal sense, but rainer is accurate in the sentiment. The media used the word 'interference' in an exaggerated and nefarious context, and they didn't seem very interested in clearing it up. Election interference--without context--is usually taken to mean vote interference. Like many things, it isn't an outright lie. But I do think it was misleading. And while you might not have been mislead, enough people were--as evidenced by that poll.