4 ms·
Reading your description seems like it was squarely in the GPs Case #1, not Case #2.
by lsaferite 6y ago
Reading your description seems like it was squarely in the GPs Case #1, not Case #2.
- giantg2 6y ago#1 implies the firing of a bad manager, which didn't happen. It also requires others in the group to back me up (as a security concern very few people knew). #2 seemed more fitting since no action was taken. And it resulted in me leaving that area of the company (voluntarily thankfully).